As he explained in his autobiography, "A Charge to Keep: My Journey to the White House":Hey dubya, how many must die for your folly before you recognize the parallels between Vietnam and your own misguided invasion of Iraq?
"My inclination was to support the government and the war until proven wrong, and that only came later, as I realized we could not explain the mission, had no exit strategy, and did not seem to be fighting to win."
How is it that he ultimately came to see the fiasco in Vietnam so clearly but remains so blind to the frighteningly similar realities of his own war in Iraq? Mr. Bush cannot explain our mission in Iraq and has nothing resembling an exit strategy, and his troops - hobbled by shortages of personnel and by potentially fatal American and Iraqi political considerations - are certainly not fighting to win.
As the situation in Iraq moves from bad to worse, the president, based on his public comments, seems to be edging further and further from reality. This is disturbing, to say the least. The news from Iraq is filled with reports of kidnappings and beheadings, of people pleading desperately for their lives, of American soldiers being ambushed and killed, of clusters of Iraqis being blown to pieces by suicide bombers, and of the prospects for a credible election in January tumbling toward nil.
I temporarily reopened Middle Earth Journal when Newshoggers shut it's doors but I was invited to Participate at The Moderate Voice so Middle Earth Journal is once again in hiatus.
Friday, September 24, 2004
Bob Herbert on the Iraq Smiley Face
Bob Herbert of the NYT is one of the few columnists that continually has a grasp of reality, Krugman of course is another. In his piece today, Bush Upbeat as Iraq Burns, Herbert points out the inane hypocrisy of Bush's comments on the Vietnam war and the deteriorating situation in Iraq.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be Nice