Kathleen Willey suspects Clintons murdered husband
In a new book alleging a campaign of slander and intimidation orchestrated chiefly by Hillary Clinton, Kathleen Willey points a finger of suspicion at the former first couple for the death of her husband, who was believed to have killed himself.Now if your like me you didn't remember who Kathleen Willey is. Well fear not, the BartBlog reminds us:
Willey, who claims she was groped by President Clinton in the White House, acknowledged in an interview with WND today that she stands by the speculation she poses about her husband's demise in "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton," set for release this week by World Ahead Publishing, WND Books' partner.
Asked if she suspects her husband Ed, a lawyer and son of a prominent Virginia lawmaker, was murdered, Willey replied, "Most definitely."
"I'm having someone with a forensics background look at this, and I intend to pursue this further, now that these questions have been raised," she told WND, pointing to alleged discrepancies in the autopsy report.
Does she believe the Clintons were involved?
"I do have suspicions," Willey said, "yes."
She accused Bill Clinton of groping her and became Ken Starr’s star witness! OK, she kept getting plastic surgery paid for by some anonymous person, and Starr kept having to give her new immunity because she kept lying under oath, but it seems that she’s as honest as, well, Rudy Giuliani.Rick Moran thinks the Bush Derangement Syndrome has it's origin in the Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
There is absolutely no doubt that Bush Derangement Syndrome’s roots can be found in the Clinton Derangement Syndrome of the 1990’s. And if this book is any indication, BDS will continue to run long after George leaves office:I can see Rick's point but I think the incompetent and misguided policies of the Bush administration have a lot to do with BDS; as shown by the polls, Clinton had an approval ratting in the 60s, Bush's approval rating is in the upper 20s. This nonsense will pass quickly.
Joe Gandelman gets it right:
NOTE TO THOSE WHO THINK THIS WINS VOTES: There are independent voters such as myself who truly will listen to all candidates, even those with which we disagree strongly, and make up our minds accordingly. This kind of speculative crap does not BELONG in American politics.
It may delight those who already see X, Y or Z as evil incarnate (because X.Y and Z dare disagree with them on issues so anything can be disseminated to take them out) but there are some voters who will make sure that the side that promotes this kind of bilge doesn’t get their votes on Election Day.