Hunter at Dkos doesn't think much of the DLC either. He gives us three reasons why the DLC is detested by "real" Democrats.
It's pretty amazing that an orginzation with "a remarkable track record of losing" is trying to tell Democrats what they need to do to win.
- The more corporate-tailored elements of the DLC agenda are frequently at odds with Democratic "heartland" interests.
- The DLC "framing" of candidates and issues is so forcefully homogenized as to render those candidates and issues politically and morally translucent.
- The DLC has a remarkable track record of losing.
And Digby chimes in:
What this points up is the fact that the DLC badly misunderstands the reasons why the grassroots reject their leadership. It's only partially to do with policy and has almost nothing to do with ideology. It's about tactics and strategy. We see their split-the-difference "third way" approach -- particularly their rhetoric --- as a form of appeasement that may have made sense in a time of shared power but that is now self-defeating and dangerous.This is particularly so in light of the demonstrable ruthlessness of the opposition and their willingness to go far beyond any normal political limits.
Related Posts
More on the Democratic Leadership Council
There must be joy in Republican Land
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be Nice