They'll be charging for the privilege of reading MoDo and Krugman and Brooks. I can understand the economics of this, as newspaper circulation declines. But I wonder if, in the long run, this is a wise move on their part. By sectioning off their op-ed columnists and best writers, they are cutting them off from the life-blood of today's political debate: the free blogosphere. Inevitably, fewer people will link to them; fewer will read them; their influence will wane faster than it has already. The blog is already becoming a rival to the dated op-ed column format as a means of communicating opinion journalism. My bet is that the NYT's retrogressive move will only fasten the decline of op-ed columnists' influence.Fewer links-less influence, that's a reality the NYT doesn't seem to get.
I temporarily reopened Middle Earth Journal when Newshoggers shut it's doors but I was invited to Participate at The Moderate Voice so Middle Earth Journal is once again in hiatus.
Monday, May 16, 2005
NYT Toll Booth
Andrew Sullivan reports on the decision of the New York Times to Withdraw from The Blogosphere and I think he gets it right.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be Nice