The Democrats should be praying that this moron will be successful in his attempt to grab the Republican nomination for President in 2008.SEN. SCHUMER: Isn't it correct that on March 8, 2000, my colleague [Sen. Frist] voted to uphold the filibuster of Judge Richard Paez?
SEN. FRIST: The president, the um, in response, uh, the Paez nomination - we'll come back and discuss this further. - Actually I'd like to, and it really brings to what I believe - a point - and it really brings to, oddly, a point, what is the issue. The issue is we have leadership-led partisan filibusters that have, um, obstructed, not one nominee, but two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, in a routine way.
You will see that Frist actually undercuts his own argument that the filibuster is unconstitutional. One filibuster is OK but more than one is unconstitutional?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be Nice