Adam Nagourney doesn't disappoint

Adam Nagourney's article on the debate was just the filling of empty space with words. He could find nothing bad to say about Kerry's performance so he just said nothing at all. He could find nothing good to say about Bush's performance so he just said nothing at all. Even the wingnuts at FOX gave a better analysis. I'm not going to quote anything because there is nothing in the column worth quoting. Why does this guy still have a job?